Go to Insurance Insight homepage
Digital Publisher of the Year 2010Digital Publisher of the Year 2010
  • Subscribe to Insurance Insight newsletters
  • Join Insurance Insight’s LinkedIn group
  • Follow Insurance Insight on Twitter
  • Join Insurance Insight’s facebook group
  • Insurance Insight RSS feeds
add

European risk managers join chorus of concern over Solvency II

by
  • Re-tweet
european-commission2-0909

The Federation of Europe Risk Management Associations today said that although it supports the goal of Solvency II, its members are concerned by the impact the recommendations of the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors will have on the insurance market.

"The main goal of Solvency II is to protect policyholders' interests" says Peter den Dekker, president of Ferma. "And we represent the largest policyholders in Europe. We have serious concerns that excessive levels of capital requirements as they are currently stated by CEIOPS will affect the availability of insurance cover for medium and large European businesses.

"The fact that insurance companies are concerned that they will have to raise premium by 20% for non-life insurance is a notable development. However, our main concern is the potential reduction in the number of insurers capable of covering our risks. This could force us to retain more risks on our balance sheet, impacting our ability to invest and remain competitive in a global economy."

Increasing capital (by 30 to 50% according to the the recent CEA report) will not necessarily bring better security particularly for catastrophe risks, but will certainly have an impact on premium costs (up to 50% for certain line of business) and product availability.

Ferma, therefore, recommends that a prudent calibration of the Solvency II models should be conducted prior to implementation.

In the absence of adequate choice in the commercial insurance market, Ferma believes large policyholders will have to use alternative solutions to cover their risks. In many cases this would normally be achieved by an increased use of their captive (re)insurance companies. However, Ferma is also concerned about the effect of Solvency II on captives.

Ferma claims that the specific nature of captives should adequately be recognized in Solvency II. The formulas for calculation of capital requirements and corporate governance principles need to be simplified and aligned to the captive business models. The proportionality principle should apply to captive undertakings.

Ferma is concerned that under the present CEIOPS project most captives will be excluded from access to these simplification measures. This could result in a reduction of the number of captive (re)insurance companies, which have proven to be essential risk management and risk financing tools for large businesses.


Ferma reckons that a balance is required between protecting the consumer through capital requirements and guaranteeing the consumer a wide choice of competitively priced insurance products and mechanisms.

"We continue our discussions with CEIOPS and the European Commission on both the general impact on the insurance market and the captive industry. Providing solutions to the European Commission is something insurers should be able to do better!" added Mr den Dekker.

"Ferma is in positive discussions with the European Commission and is currently proposing solutions to protect the captive (re)insurance companies' interests. We trust that the European Commission will be able to balance Solvency II requirements in a way that the real economy will not be affected and our members will still be able to be competitive."

Visitor comments Add your comment

  
We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & ConditionsYour comment will be moderated before publication



Submit your comment
Post webinar 090512

Online video: Commercial property - managing natural disaster risk

Globally, 2011 was a record year for natural catastrophe losses, highlighting flood risk as an issue of major concern for corporates, their brokers and insurers.

Creme brulee (Shutterstock)

James Portelli

The GCC insurance market: Crème brûlée or Heath Bar?

Dubai

James Portelli

Middle East guest blog: A silver lining?

Pile of pennies

James Portelli

Middle East guest blog: Pennywise pound foolish in health insurance?

Pitney Bowes 2012 Insurance Industry Report

2012 insurance industry report: The inside track to achieving a more sustainable business

To achieve a sustainable profit, personal lines insurers need to transform their retention rates, using modern communications techniques to engage with customers and understand their individual needs. This white paper is based on a specially commissioned study involving 42 senior managers at UK and Irish insurers.

Work equipment risks in the UK

Work equipment risks in the UK

The complex patchwork of legislation and guidance governing work equipment risks in the UK is an administrative monster that many businesses struggle to wrestle with successfully. It takes significant levels of technical expertise and resources to understand and effectively navigate the maze of legal requirements, and this problem grows increasingly unwieldy for smaller organisations with limited manpower and finances.

Beyond Solvency II - Turning risk management compliance into competitive advantage

Beyond Solvency II: Turning risk management compliance into competitive advantage

This white paper focuses on visionary insurers and service providers who see Solvency II not as an exercise in compliance, but as an opportunity to build new capabilities that can lead to competitive advantage and fresh revenue streams.

Platinum partner

Insurance Insight is brought to you in association with Ernst & Young

ernst