The International Federation of Risk and Insurance Management Associations has welcomed the flexibility of the Brazilian government in responding to the world-wide concern about its new reinsurance regulations, but believes more needs to be done to limit the negative impact on insurance capacity and cost.
By replacing Resolution 224 with Resolution 232, the Brazil government is permitting insurance companies to cede up to 20% of each reinsurance treaty to companies based abroad that are linked with or belong to the same financial group, instead of prohibiting intra-group transfers.
It is a common opinion among insurance and reinsurance players, in addition to the buyers of insurance represented by IFRIMA, that Resolution 232 is an important step in maintaining the development of the Brazilian market since liberalisation began in 2007.
Unfortunately, IFIRMA believes it is still not enough. The restrictions that remain, plus a second Resolution that mandates placement of business with local reinsurers, still create the danger of reduced capacity, especially for large risks, and higher costs for industry.
IFRIMA said without further changes many business opportunities could be lost to Brazil, and that even businesses which were starting to grow as a result of big investment from various multinationals after the end of the reinsurance monopoly could think again about their future.
It added: "We trust that the current position is an intermediate situation for the sector and that an equitable situation can be reached for all the parties involved in this promising market."
Globally, 2011 was a record year for natural catastrophe losses, highlighting flood risk as an issue of major concern for corporates, their brokers and insurers.
The GCC insurance market: Crème brûlée or Heath Bar?
Middle East guest blog: A silver lining?
Middle East guest blog: Pennywise pound foolish in health insurance?
To achieve a sustainable profit, personal lines insurers need to transform their retention rates, using modern communications techniques to engage with customers and understand their individual needs. This white paper is based on a specially commissioned study involving 42 senior managers at UK and Irish insurers.
The complex patchwork of legislation and guidance governing work equipment risks in the UK is an administrative monster that many businesses struggle to wrestle with successfully. It takes significant levels of technical expertise and resources to understand and effectively navigate the maze of legal requirements, and this problem grows increasingly unwieldy for smaller organisations with limited manpower and finances.
This white paper focuses on visionary insurers and service providers who see Solvency II not as an exercise in compliance, but as an opportunity to build new capabilities that can lead to competitive advantage and fresh revenue streams.
Visitor comments Add your comment